This might be a bit of a cop out, but the concept I learned in this class that I will most likely end up incorporating into my teaching is the use of online web tools in general. I know I'm not supposed to discuss a specific tool in this post, but I'd be lying if I said that using them in general was less than the most valuable concept I'll be taking away from EDUC 932.
In my initial blog post about what I hope to learn from this course, I wrote:
"Hopefully, EDUC 932 will expose me to more technology-based methods of teaching and will turn me on to some websites and programs that can be useful in the classroom. I am not a traditional learner in the sense that one should be able to follow instructions and pick up on a new skill or concept. I generally prefer to be exposed and left to my own devices to experiment and learn through trial and error. I guess you could say that, ideally, EDUC 932 will plant seeds in my mind that can grow into flowering technological advances in my teaching later on."
I don't mean to brag, but I know myself pretty well (or I'm guilty of self-fulfilling prophecy). I've already used a screen cast (a term I didn't know before this course) to show a class that was cancelled last week how to format their essays, and I've planned a podcast assignment too.
It's tough integrating technology into a school with limited facilities like mine, but I might be heading for greener pastures next school year. If so, I'll be able to expand on my use of technology in the classroom, and hopefully expand my grasp on it too.
Saturday, June 11, 2016
SAMR is MIA
Ruben Puentedura's presentation on the SAMR is compelling, but just not something I can relate to at the moment. Teaching at a government school in Thailand means extremely limited technology in the classroom, and it also means very limited time with my students.
Since my school, and particularly the program I teach in, caters to the arts, I meet few future engineers or technology buffs. Combined with my lack of affinity for technology (I don't even have a smart phone), the result is very few opportunities to integrate technology into my lessons.
I sometimes have students use Google Docs and Slides and sometimes have my classes make videos. But when it comes to using ipads or computers on the regular, my chances are few and far between.
What I'd like to say to the education world...
If there is one message I'd like to shout from the top of a mountain to every administrator, teacher's union, educator, and student in the world, it is this: stop standardizing.
I imagine that many people would assume that I am referring to standardized testing, but that is just one tiny component of what I see as a gradually centralizing behemoth of universal miseducation. I want the whole system to come crashing down. Be it Common Core, No Child Left Behind, the constant re-brandings of the ESEA, or the Department of Education itself, I want pedagogy to become local, personalized, and specialized.
I believe that while people are born with equal rights, we are born with drastically different abilities. Some students are good at math, others aren't. Some students care about their grammar, others don't. Some students can be still and attentive in 50-minute intervals from 8am-3pm five days a week for twelve years, others can't. Because of this, education should never attempt to create universal standards. Students should be treated differently, and should face teachers with different styles, demands, and curricula. The world has no standards, so it is silly to impose standards on the youth to prepare them for the world.
If I were in charge, some changes I would make in America are:
1. Auctioning off all public schools into private hands (and using the profits of these sales to pay off the debt)
2. Abolishing laws that require parents to send their children to school and scaling back child labor laws, so families can allow their children to develop skills and earn money if they feel it's more beneficial to their children than sitting in a classroom all day
3. Abolishing the Department of Education and returning total control of education to the states and localities
4. Removing the licensing and education degree requirements for perspective teachers in favor of expertise/experience in the subject the teacher desires to teach and life experience in general (additionally, I would do everything in my power to remove all hopes of job security from teachers to force them to stay on top of their game or risk getting canned)
5. Allowing teachers to use limitied corporal punishment if need be
6. Encouraging morals, ethics, and values to take primacy above more scholastic academic fields in school
Rant over.
Movie Unit
Here is my movie unit. This is a project I've done with my 12th graders the past two years. The last two chapters of our textbook focus on food concerns and health issues, so a diet and exercise plan video makes sense to me. Since most of my students are infected with senioritis by the end of the year, it's just easy enough to convince most of them to do a decent job.
***
M6 English Speaking
and Listening Formative 2 Assignment: Exercise and Diet plan video
1.
Your assignment is to come up with a weekly routine that people in
Bangkok can follow to maintain a healthy lifestyle
2.
Focus on diet and/or exercise
3.
Your routine should be healthy, affordable, and enjoyable,
but not time consuming
4.
Your video should be fun. It can be like an infomercial, an exercise
video, a cooking show, a skit, or anything else you want
5.
You will work in in five groups of 7-10 people
6.
You will make a five-minute video (shorter than 4:00 or longer than
6:00= -3 points)
7.
Everyone in your group should speak in your
video
8.
I will evaluate you based on three factors:
a.
Your plan (Does it make sense? Is it creative? Is it practical?) 5
points
b.
Your English (Are you using English effectively?) 5 points
c.
Your video (Is it fun, interesting, and filmed/edited well?) 5 points
9.
We will watch your videos on the last day of class.
Due Date: Last day of class
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Plan
|
Thoughtful,
creative, and practical!
|
One of the three previous
criteria is lacking
|
Two of the three
previous criteria are lacking
|
All of the three
previous criteria are lacking
|
Not much of a plan
at all
|
English
|
All group members
spoke accurately, clearly, and confidently
|
All group members
spoke, and most spoke well
|
Several members did
not speak, or many did not speak well
|
Few members spoke,
or few spoke well
|
Not acceptable for
M6 English
|
Video
|
Very attractive and
shows great effort
|
Nice to look at with
good effort
|
Pretty good video
with some effort
|
Not great to look at
and not enough effort
|
Poorly done
|
My Sample Video
Audio Lesson
Current Events Commentary Podcast
- -Your assignment is to record a 15-minute
podcast that reports and discusses a current events news story
- - You are to work in groups of 3
-Your
podcast should be no shorter than 14 minutes, and no longer than 16 minutes (-1 point every 30 seconds over or under time)
- -No more than 2 minutes of your podcast
should be spent on introductions and reading the news combined; the vast
majority should be analysis, debate, and discussion
- -You can share your honest opinions as
yourselves, or act as biased, agenda-driven pundits
- -You can use a guide and talking points, but your podcast
should be mostly unscripted
- -My sample was recorded on speakpipe.com; you may use any program or website of your choice to record yours
Due Date: July 6th
in class
Evaluation
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
Speaking
|
Virtually
fluent, clear, and confident
|
Few
mistakes, mostly clear, and decent confidence exhibited
|
Quite
a few mistakes, some parts difficult to comprehend, and lacks confidence
|
Unacceptable
for gifted English students
|
Content
|
Good
choice of news story; intriguing analysis and discussion
|
Fairly
interesting analysis and discussion
|
Somewhat
boring discussion
|
Mostly
thoughtless
|
Production
Quality
|
Shows
effort, planning, and care
|
Acceptable,
but not spectacular
|
Could
use some more work
|
Lazily
done
|
Friday, June 10, 2016
Website
Here is a website a created for my 11th grade English class. I normally use a Facebook group to communicate with my students outside of school. Here are links to both:
New Website
Facebook Group
New Website
Facebook Group
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Syllabus
Here is a link to my course syllabus. It's a PowerPoint presentation that I uploaded to SlideShare.
Check it out.
Check it out.
Sunday, May 29, 2016
Should ideas be considered property?
I've seen the "Everything is a Remix" series before. It's one of the most interesting and thought-provoking sets of videos I've ever seen and forced me to heavily question my beliefs.
Prior to watching "Everything is a Remix", I was dead-set in my respect for intellectual property. I learned early on in school that plagiarism is theft and that copyrights and patents are as legitimate is the deed to one's house.
But unlike theft of physical property, ideas, as the video explains, are inspired by the ideas of others. There is no doubt that "we stand on the shoulders of giants" and that our thoughts and words are heavily influenced by the thoughts and words of others. Ideas are intangible and can happen simultaneously in separate minds, so there is a clear distinction between a thought and a piece of matter.
The concept of ideas being treated as property invokes feelings of Orwellian thought crimes. Should we be prosecuting people for the activity that takes place in their heads? Should we empower the authorities to investigate the content of our minds?
Towards the end of the video, the narrator says that the result of intellectual property laws has not been more progress and learning. This is a cynical and grossly inaccurate statement. We're on the verge of producing self-driving cars, renewable rocket ships, and private trips into outer space. Regardless of our policies on intellectually property, I'd say we're progressing just fine.
One potential problem I foresee that could come with easing up on intellectual property laws is replacing patent trolls with idea trolls. What would stop the parasitic among us from leaning over the shoulders of our innovators and stealing their ideas? How would an economy of inventors forced to shelter their thoughts and trust no one function?
I love discussing social and political issues and have principled opinions on most of them, but I need some more time to hear arguments and think this one through. It's a tough one.
Prior to watching "Everything is a Remix", I was dead-set in my respect for intellectual property. I learned early on in school that plagiarism is theft and that copyrights and patents are as legitimate is the deed to one's house.
But unlike theft of physical property, ideas, as the video explains, are inspired by the ideas of others. There is no doubt that "we stand on the shoulders of giants" and that our thoughts and words are heavily influenced by the thoughts and words of others. Ideas are intangible and can happen simultaneously in separate minds, so there is a clear distinction between a thought and a piece of matter.
The concept of ideas being treated as property invokes feelings of Orwellian thought crimes. Should we be prosecuting people for the activity that takes place in their heads? Should we empower the authorities to investigate the content of our minds?
Towards the end of the video, the narrator says that the result of intellectual property laws has not been more progress and learning. This is a cynical and grossly inaccurate statement. We're on the verge of producing self-driving cars, renewable rocket ships, and private trips into outer space. Regardless of our policies on intellectually property, I'd say we're progressing just fine.
One potential problem I foresee that could come with easing up on intellectual property laws is replacing patent trolls with idea trolls. What would stop the parasitic among us from leaning over the shoulders of our innovators and stealing their ideas? How would an economy of inventors forced to shelter their thoughts and trust no one function?
I love discussing social and political issues and have principled opinions on most of them, but I need some more time to hear arguments and think this one through. It's a tough one.
My Favorite Lesson
My favorite lesson would have to be teaching Ernest Hemmingway's "Hills like White Elephants". It's a famous short story that consists of little else than a conversation between two young travelers deciding what to do about their pregnancy.
First off, the story is fantastic. It's the perfect length for a 50-minute class to read and analyze, contains unique vocabulary words and phrases, and exemplifies the eternal friction and misunderstanding between man and woman. The writing is off the charts brilliant and it makes way for several excellent discussion.
Most students who read the story find it boring (as I did when my teacher had us read it in high school). There is no action at all, and the main subject of the characters' discussion is implicit. But being able to comment and point out careful details throughout the story makes reading it fun thanks to the added tension and curiosity.
Possibly the most impressive aspect of "Hills like White Elephants" is the rapid character development. It's hardly 4 pages long, but you really get to know and understand the two main character before it's over.
The best part of the lesson is having the class try to figure out what the characters were speaking about the whole time. What is "it"? I've read the story with hundreds of students, but fewer than 3 have ever figured it out on their own. We go back through the story methodically and I point out details and ask questions until a lightbulb goes off in someone's head...
***SPOILER ALERT!***
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
..
"they're talking about having an abortion!"
The shock and awe on my students' faces when they figure it out is priceless. The lesson learned is that we don't always have to be so explicit in our writing, but we always have to be perceptive and critical in our reading.
An Evaluation of My Digital Footprint
I Googled myself to get a glimpse of my digital footprint. I'm not too sure how I feel about it. The first page of search results are my Twitter account (which I am thinking of creating an alias for), 3 links to Facebook (my special teacher account for my students, a list of accounts for the name "Glenn Verasco", and an account my friends in college made for me before I had my own Facebook), my LinkedIn account (which my fiance recently updates), my voices.com account (I momentarily thought about a career as a voice actor), two YouTube videos made by my students (a recipe and a video featuring me), whitepages.com (creepy), and my bandmix.com account (that was from my college days too).
To improve my digital footprint, I would like to do the following:
1. Change my Twitter account name to an alias. I do not use Twitter as a means of communicating with friends or colleagues. I use it almost strictly as a way to access up-to-the-minute news coverage and compliment/criticize writers after reading their articles. By switching from my name to an alias, I will be able to Tweet more freely and espouse my political views without the risk of being discriminated against for expressing myself.
2. Remember who made my fake Facebook account in college and ask him/her to delete it.
3. Achieve greatness and have my achievement covered by a major news source, so those who Google me will have a wonderful first impression of me.
To improve my digital footprint, I would like to do the following:
1. Change my Twitter account name to an alias. I do not use Twitter as a means of communicating with friends or colleagues. I use it almost strictly as a way to access up-to-the-minute news coverage and compliment/criticize writers after reading their articles. By switching from my name to an alias, I will be able to Tweet more freely and espouse my political views without the risk of being discriminated against for expressing myself.
2. Remember who made my fake Facebook account in college and ask him/her to delete it.
3. Achieve greatness and have my achievement covered by a major news source, so those who Google me will have a wonderful first impression of me.
Google Form for Evaluation/Observation
Here is my evaluation form. It is a comprehensive personal assessment to be used to evaluate my 11th Grade gifted English students whom I have taught for the past two years.
Thursday, May 26, 2016
Presentation Unit
The following is a project I assign my 12th grade English classes. I teach large classes of about 40 students each, and take advantage of if it by assigning this big, complex project called "The Perfect Country Project". The basic idea is that my classes take some debate topics we use in class to poll people outside of school in Bangkok. They get into specialized teams, collect the polls, analyze the information, and give a PowerPoint presentation at the end of the term.
Below is the project in detail. I couldn't figure out how to upload a file to this blog, so I just copy and pasted it. It's quite long and complex. A rubric is included. After the details of the assignment, a link to my screencast can be found below.
The
Perfect Country Project
Teacher:
Aj.
Glenn Verasco
Classes:
48, 49, 58, 59, 80, 81, 125, 126, 143, 222, 223, 224
Due
Dates: Progress Report: July 8th
Presentations:
The last day of class before finals
Objective: For
the next few weeks, we will be discussing the dichotomy of “Tradition vs.
Progress”. We will do some reading in Pathways, and debate and discuss
various topics as a class. Unfortunately, our class demographic is not
particularly diverse (we’re all Thai 12th graders [except for me!]).
The purpose of this project is to get a more varied and worldly view of these
topics. Your assignment is to poll about 800 people as a class so we can get an
idea of what the average person thinks. You will not only look at the grand
totals of the poll results, but will also find differences and similarities
between the sexes, age groups, and many nationalities. You will be working as a
team, and must all do your part to make this project happen.
Evaluation:
Category/Score
|
5.5
|
4.125
|
2.75
|
1.375
|
Content
|
Full
of quality information
|
Some
very good content
|
Not
enough information and seems flawed
|
Not
at all educational and most likely inaccurate
|
Analysis/
Comprehension
|
Brilliantly
critiqued and evaluated; you really get it!
|
Some
thoughtful criticism and mostly understood
|
A
few decent points, but could use some more thought
|
Not
well thought out or comprehended
|
Organization
|
Absolutely
ready to be presented and flawlessly delivered
|
Given
plenty of thought ahead of time with little confusion
|
Should
have been better prepared, but a decent outcome
|
Not
ready to be presented and disappointing
|
Aesthetics
|
Includes
photos of procedure; a pleasure to view
|
Nice
looking and clear; includes photos
|
Not
particularly nice to look at, but not bad
|
Unclear,
dull, and lazily done
|
Value: 30 points (4 points for the progress report, 22
points for the final project, 2 points for self-evaluation, 2 points for
evaluation from the management team)
Teams
and Responsibilities:
*** EVERY STUDENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COLLECTING
10 POLLS FROM THAI NATIONALS AND 10 POLLS FROM FOREIGNERS***
Management Team (3-5 students):
-
Oversee the entire project
-
Attend Q&A meeting in room 262 with Aj.
Glenn (Wednesday, June 1st)
-
Create a checklist to use for completing each
part of the project
-
Keep track of which students are in which
groups
-
Make sure all students have taken care of
their responsibilities efficiently
-
Hand in progress report the week before
midterms (this covers your class’s formative 1 score)
-
Evaluate each student at the completion of
the project
Poll Team (4-6 students):
-
Create 10 poll statements (suggested
themes provided by Aj. Glenn)
-
Translate poll statements into Thai (or
English if you wrote them in Thai first)
-
Translate “Mission Statement” from English
to Thai
-
Have poll statements approved by Aj. Glenn
(June 17th at the latest)
-
Predict how different demographics will
vote on each topic (must be done before polls are collected)
Design Team (6-10 students):
-
Design and create anonymous poll sheet
o
Must include:
§ Poll
statements
§ Age
§ Gender
§ Nationality
§ Mission
Statement (can be on a separate sheet of paper)
-
Use collected data to create a PowerPoint presentation
(graphs, charts, tables, photos, etc…)
-
Help Presentation Team prepare for
presentation
-
Collect photographs of entire process
Data Team (8-12 students):
-
Collect completed polls from all
classmates (20 per classmate)
-
Organize collected data based on the following
criteria
o
Grand totals
o
Thai vs. Foreign grand totals
o
Male vs. Female grand totals
o
Thai Male vs. Thai Female totals
o
Foreign Male vs. Foreign Female totals
o
Age group grand totals
o
Thai age groups
o
Foreign age groups
-
Deliver data to the design team
Analysis Team (5-7 students):
-
Thoroughly answer analysis questions
(provided by Aj. Glenn)
-
Find other notable trends and results within
data
-
Explain findings to presentation team
Presentation Team (4-6 students):
-
Answer questions about the process of completing
the project (provided by Aj. Glenn)
-
Present project results to class at the
end of the semester (it should be as long as one class period)
Mission
Statement and Poll Statements
The following is the mission statement for our
project. You can let English speakers read this as I have written it before
they participate, and must translate it into Thai for Thai speakers.
Dear
Friend,
Our
class has been discussing and debating what policies a “perfect country” would
have. As a class, we agree on certain topics, but disagree on others. Now, we
want to find out what policies other people think would make a perfect country.
We
would greatly appreciate your anonymous participation in our study, and promise
to invite you for an all-expenses-paid trip to our perfect country once it has
been founded!
Thanks
for your help! J
-The
Perfect Country Project Team (Triam Udom Suksa School)
Making
the Poll Statements (Poll team)
Your poll questions should
be in the form of a statement. This is called a “Likert Scale”.
Chocolate
ice cream is the best kind of ice cream in the world.
___ Totally Agree ___ Agree ___ No Opinion ___ Disagree ___ Totally Disagree
Our poll questions will be a
bit more serious than chocolate ice cream. Here are five sample questions for
your poll (you may use one of these for your poll if you would like).
1.
It should
be legal for committed homosexual couples to adopt children.
2.
Wages
should be negotiated by employers and employees without government
interference.
3.
All able
male citizens should be required to serve in the military for at least two
years.
4.
Taxes
should be high so the government can provide social welfare like education,
healthcare, food, and housing for the less fortunate.
5.
Abortion
should be illegal except in cases of rape or a threat to the mother’s health.
Remember, your polls should be controversial (meaning people will disagree with each other about
them). If you use a statement like “murder should be illegal”, everyone
will choose the same answer, and we will learn nothing. Try to think about
“Tradition and Progress” when making your poll questions. Here are some themes
you can think about when creating polls:
-
Taxes
-
Economics
-
The Environment
-
Gay Marriage
-
Abortion
-
The Death Penalty
-
Immigration
-
Military
-
Citizenship
-
Form of
Government
-
Freedom of
Religion
-
Freedom of
Speech
-
Education
-
Prostitution
-
Voting
-
Trade
-
Foreign Policy
-
Healthcare
-
Etc…
***A perfect poll will have
5 statements from a traditional (Conservative) point of view, and 5 statements
from a progressive (Liberal) point of view.***
Designing
the poll (Design team)
The way you design your poll
is up to you. But here are a few requirements, and a few suggestions.
Requirements
1.
It must include
all ten statements and space to fill out the poll.
2.
It must include
a space for the participants to write their age, gender, and nationality.
3.
The “Mission
Statement” must be viewable for participants.
4.
Since the polls
are anonymous, the poll must
not ask for participants’ names.
Suggestions
1.
Try to use as
little paper as possible for environmental and monetary reasons.
2.
Use recycled
paper.
3.
Keep the
“Mission Statement” separate from the polls, and have it displayed on a
clipboard to save paper.
Questions
(for Presentation Team and Analysis Team)
Presentation
Team
1. Please
explain the process you used to complete this project.
2. Where
did you find people to participate in the poll?
3. What
did you think would be the most difficult part of completing the project?
4. What
turned out to be the most difficult challenge you faced?
5. What
did you enjoy about completing this project?
6. What
did you learn from participating in this project?
Analysis Team
Expectations (to be answered before data
is collected)
1. Of
the ten statements, which do you think come from the most extremely traditional
and extremely progressive points of view?
2. Which
demographics do you predict will vote the most progressively, and which will be
the most traditional?
3. What
are some other predictions you have for how the polls will turn out?
4. Do
you think the project will be successful? Why or why not?
Basic Results
1. Which
statement had the highest overall approval rating?
2. Which
statement had the lowest overall approval rating?
3. Which
statement was the most controversial? (had the most people voting “totally
agree” and “totally disagree”)
4. Which
demographics voted most similarly?
5. Which
demographics voted most differently?
6. On
which statements did men and women disagree the most?
7. On
which statements did Thais and foreigners disagree the most?
8. On
which statements did different age groups disagree the most?
Critical Thinking
1. Please
explain what you think the purpose of this project was.
2. By
your definitions, which demographic voted the most traditionally, and which
voted the most progressively?
3. Why
do you think certain demographics voted in certain ways?
a. Thais
b. Foreigners
c. Males
d. Females
e. Different
Age Groups
f. Etc…
4. Which
results were the most surprising and why?
5. Critique
the project and its results: Is doing a project like this useful? Why? What are
the project’s flaws?
6. How
seriously should we take the results of the polls?
BEST OF LUCK!!! J
Click here to see my screencast!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)